Amp vs Augment Code
Amp and Augment Code both run AI coding agents, but Amp is closer to metered developer tooling while Augment Code packages team controls and Cosmos workflows.
Amp is Sourcegraph's metered agent workspace: credits fund threads, Oracle-style assistance, subagents, CLI/editor use, and model pass-through costs. Augment Code is an organization platform built around Cosmos, Context Engine, review flows, MCP tools, and pooled Business usage. This is a spend comparison, not a like-for-like IDE matchup.
Quick Verdict
Choose Amp if you want thread-level agent work, direct credit spend, and pass-through model costs without a seat subscription. Choose Augment Code if a team needs Cosmos workflows, Context Engine, pooled usage, concurrent sessions, GitHub review, analytics, and enterprise controls. The pricing trap differs: Amp credits expire after one year of account inactivity, while Augment Business includes $100 of usage but adds a 40% fee on LLM usage.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Category | Amp | Augment Code |
|---|---|---|
| Best fit | Developers who want metered AI coding | Teams standardizing agentic coding |
| Billing model | Credits, no subscription commitment | Flat Business plan plus usage top-ups |
| Entry paid plan | $5 minimum credit purchase | Business at $100/month |
| Enterprise trigger | $1,000 one-time Enterprise purchase | Custom Enterprise plan |
| Code workflow | Threads, CLI, workspace usage | Cosmos agents, reviews, CLI, MCP |
| Security controls | Enterprise SSO and retention controls | SOC 2, CMEK, SIEM, SSO, audit trails |
| Team limit | Workspace credits are pooled | Business includes up to 50 seats |
Features and Workflow
Amp is useful when developers want to see what each thread costs and keep the buying model close to raw model usage. Its manual says individual and non-enterprise workspaces have zero markup on provider API pricing, and Amp deducts actual model and tool costs from credits.
Augment Code is more structured for teams. Its local package and pricing page describe Context Engine, Coding Agent, Chat and Agents, CLI access, MCP and native tools, usage analytics, Cosmos, daemon mode, and 50 concurrent sessions on Business. That fits code review, triage, and shared agent workflows.
Pricing Comparison
As of June 2026, Amp has no subscription or commitment for individual and non-enterprise workspaces. The minimum credit purchase is $5, and unused credits expire after one year of account inactivity. Amp Enterprise usage is 50% more expensive and starts with a one-time $1,000 purchase that becomes Enterprise usage credit.
Augment Code Business is $100/month with up to 50 seats and $100/month of included usage. Extra usage is pay as you go. Augment's pricing FAQ says Business usage includes LLM usage at provider list price, a flat 40% service fee on LLM usage, and Cosmos compute time.
Pick Amp If
- You want a usage ledger instead of a seat subscription.
- You prefer credits that are shared across a workspace.
- Your team is still testing agentic coding spend.
Pick Augment Code If
- You need pooled team access for up to 50 users.
- You want coding agents tied to review, triage, and analytics.
- Security and compliance controls are part of the buying decision.
Honest Verdict
Amp is the cleaner choice when developers want to inspect each thread's spend, run subagents, and keep model billing close to provider cost. Augment Code is stronger when the buyer wants Cosmos, Context Engine, shared review workflows, and enterprise controls as a managed platform. The main tradeoff is fit: Amp exposes raw spend, while Augment packages more organization workflow around a higher monthly floor.
FAQs
Amp can be worth it if you prefer usage billing with no subscription and want direct control over model spend.
Amp is Sourcegraph's AI coding agent with web, CLI, editor, and workspace usage billed from credits.
Augment Code is strong for teams because it combines Context Engine, Cosmos agents, GitHub review, CLI access, and controls.
You might also like
