Amp can be worth it if you prefer usage billing with no subscription and want direct control over model spend.

What is AMP in coding?

Amp is Sourcegraph's AI coding agent with web, CLI, editor, and workspace usage billed from credits.

Why is Augment Code so good?

Augment Code is strong for teams because it combines Context Engine, Cosmos agents, GitHub review, CLI access, and controls.

Amp vs Augment Code

Amp is Sourcegraph's metered agent workspace: credits fund threads, Oracle-style assistance, subagents, CLI/editor use, and model pass-through costs. Augment Code is an organization platform built around Cosmos, Context Engine, review flows, MCP tools, and pooled Business usage.

Quick Verdict

Choose Amp if you want thread-level agent work, direct credit spend, and pass-through model costs without a seat subscription. Choose Augment Code if a team needs Cosmos workflows, Context Engine, pooled usage, concurrent sessions, GitHub review, analytics, and enterprise controls. The pricing trap differs: Amp credits expire after one year of account inactivity, while Augment Business includes $100 of usage but adds a 40% fee on LLM usage.

Side-by-Side Comparison

Category	Amp	Augment Code
Best fit	Developers who want metered AI coding	Teams standardizing agentic coding
Billing model	Credits, no subscription commitment	Standard or Business plan plus usage top-ups
Entry paid plan	$5 minimum credit purchase	Standard at $20/month
Enterprise trigger	$1,000 one-time Enterprise purchase	Custom Enterprise plan
Code workflow	Threads, CLI, workspace usage	Cosmos agents, reviews, CLI, MCP
Security controls	Enterprise SSO and retention controls	SOC 2, CMEK, SIEM, SSO, audit trails
Team limit	Workspace credits are pooled	Business includes up to 50 seats

Features and Workflow

Amp is useful when developers want to see what each thread costs and keep the buying model close to raw model usage. Its manual says individual and non-enterprise workspaces have zero markup on provider API pricing, and Amp deducts actual model and tool costs from credits.

Augment Code is more structured for teams. Augment Code offers Context Engine, Coding Agent, Chat and Agents, CLI access, MCP and native tools, usage analytics, Cosmos, daemon mode, and 50 concurrent sessions on Business. That fits code review, triage, and shared agent workflows.

Pricing Comparison

As of June 2026, Amp has no subscription or commitment for individual and non-enterprise workspaces. The minimum credit purchase is $5, and unused credits expire after one year of account inactivity. Amp Enterprise usage is 50% more expensive and starts with a one-time $1,000 purchase that becomes Enterprise usage credit.

Augment Code Standard is $20/month with $20 of included usage and up to 50 seats. Business is $100/month with $100 of included usage and up to 50 seats. Extra usage is pay as you go. Augment's pricing FAQ says both plans charge LLM usage at provider list price plus a flat 40% service fee, alongside Cosmos compute time.

Pick Amp If

You want a usage ledger instead of a seat subscription.
You prefer credits that are shared across a workspace.
Your team is still testing agentic coding spend.

Pick Augment Code If

You need pooled team access for up to 50 users.
You want coding agents tied to review, triage, and analytics.
Security and compliance controls are part of the buying decision.

Honest Verdict

Amp is the cleaner choice when developers want to inspect each thread's spend, run subagents, and keep model billing close to provider cost. Augment Code is stronger when the buyer wants Cosmos, Context Engine, shared review workflows, and enterprise controls as a managed platform. The main tradeoff is fit: Amp exposes raw spend, while Augment packages more organization workflow through Standard and Business plans.