n8n vs Make
n8n and Make both serve AI automation buyers, but the better fit depends on workflow, pricing, controls, and required limits.
n8n and Make are both considered for AI automation, but they solve different buying problems. n8n is best read as technical workflow automation platform, while Make is best read as visual automation scenario builder. This comparison uses current vendor pricing and product positioning as of June 2026, with the main decision tied to workflow, limits, and ownership.
Quick Verdict
Choose n8n when self-hosting is the daily requirement. Choose Make when scenarios matters more.
Side-by-Side Comparison
| Decision area | n8n | Make |
|---|---|---|
| Use case | n8n: technical workflow automation platform. | Make: visual automation scenario builder. |
| Operating model | self-hosting, code steps, executions, credentials, queues, and workflow control. | scenarios, routers, webhooks, credits, error handling, and app integrations. |
| Cost model | n8n cloud pricing is not published in verified USD; official cloud plans use non-USD pricing. | Make Core is $9/month for 10,000 credits, Pro $16, and Teams $29 on annual billing. |
| Admin question | Check n8n data handling, exports, seat rules, and plan limits. | Check Make data handling, exports, seat rules, and plan limits. |
| Decision risk | n8n can be a poor fit if the needed limit is only on a higher plan. | Make can be a poor fit if the core workflow differs from your team's toolchain. |
Features and Workflow
n8n starts from technical workflow automation platform and should be judged by how quickly it gets a real user from input to reviewed output. Make deserves the same practical test, but the likely friction points are different: scenarios, routers, webhooks, credits, error handling, and app integrations.
Pricing Comparison
As of June 2026, compare public plan names, credits, usage caps, and seat rules before choosing.
- n8n: n8n cloud pricing is not published in verified USD; official cloud plans use non-USD pricing.
- Make: Make Core is $9/month for 10,000 credits, Pro $16, and Teams $29 on annual billing.
Pick n8n If
- Your main workflow is self-hosting.
- You prefer n8n's setup over a broader category checklist.
- The pricing note fits the budget: Cloud pricing is not published in verified USD.
Pick Make If
- Your main workflow is scenarios.
- You prefer Make's ecosystem, integrations, or governance model.
- The pricing note fits the budget: Core is $9/month for 10,000 credits.
Honest Verdict
n8n is the better shortlist pick when its specific workflow matches the work your team repeats every week. Make is the better pick when its product model, pricing, or ecosystem removes more review and setup time.
FAQs
It depends on workflow fit. n8n is stronger for its core use case, while Make may fit different pricing or controls.
Compare the current vendor plans. Free tiers, credits, seats, and overages can change the real monthly cost.
Yes, but team features vary by plan. Check admin controls, collaboration, data settings, and support before rollout.
You might also like
