The best alternative to GitHub Copilot is Cursor. If that doesn't suit you, we've compiled a ranked list of other GitHub Copilot alternatives to help you find a suitable replacement. Other interesting alternatives to GitHub Copilot are: Devin Desktop, Claude Code, Codex and Augment Code.
GitHub Copilot alternatives are mainly AI Coding tools. Browse these if you want a narrower list of alternatives or looking for a specific functionality of GitHub Copilot.
Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI

Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that transforms how developers write and edit code through intelligent automation. Built for modern development teams, it combines traditional editing with advanced AI assistance to speed up coding workflows. The platform targets developers who want smarter code completion and AI-driven editing without sacrificing control.
Cursor sets itself apart by offering context-aware AI assistance that goes beyond basic autocomplete. The editor learns from your codebase and coding patterns to provide relevant suggestions. Its AI agents can handle complex editing tasks while maintaining code quality and consistency.
The platform offers intelligent code completion that understands project context and coding style. Users can leverage AI-powered editing for refactoring, bug fixes, and code optimization.
The editor supports collaborative development with real-time sharing and version control integration. Background agents work continuously to analyze code and suggest improvements without interrupting the development flow.
Cursor has an average rating of 4.8 out of 5 stars from over 1,200 reviews on various platforms.
Users praise the AI-powered code completion and editing features. They find the interface clean and responsive. Many appreciate the seamless integration with existing workflows. Some users mention occasional lag with large codebases. They also note that the AI suggestions can sometimes be overly aggressive for simple tasks.
Cursor offers several pricing plans:
Teams pricing starts at $40 per user monthly with Privacy Mode enforcement, admin dashboard, and centralized billing. Enterprise offers custom pricing with enhanced usage, SCIM management, and priority support.
The free Hobby plan includes a two-week Pro trial, making it easy to test premium features before committing to paid plans.
Looking for alternatives to other popular tools? Check out other posts in the alternatives series and flowtools.co, a directory of best AI tools with filters for tags and categories for easy browsing and discovery.
Devin Desktop, formerly Windsurf, is an IDE and command center for coding agents with plan-dependent usage.

Devin Desktop, formerly Windsurf, is a coding IDE and command center for local and cloud agents. Windsurf became Devin Desktop on June 2, 2026. The classic editor remains available, while the Agent Command Center brings agent work into the main interface.
The rename brings the IDE under the Devin brand alongside Cloud, CLI, and Review. It does not mean that every Windsurf plugin is the same product as Devin Desktop. The transition FAQ distinguishes the desktop IDE from other integration paths and preserves existing plan terms.
Developers can use the editor while managing coding-agent tasks from the command center. The existing Windsurf experience remains accessible rather than being removed by the rename. Organizations should review the updated application name and deployment guidance when managing desktop installations.
Paid plans provide access to more models and larger agent allowances. Usage depends on the model, task size, and reasoning required. Unlimited Tab completions or inline edits do not mean unlimited paid-model agent work. Legacy subscriptions should be assessed under their own retained terms.
Past Windsurf reviews describe earlier releases. For a current evaluation, test the editor and agent workflow on a representative repository and review the proposed code changes. No general productivity percentage is guaranteed.
Paid usage allowances refresh daily and weekly. Extra usage is available at API pricing; legacy Windsurf plans may differ.
Claude Code helps developers explore repositories, edit files, and run development commands with AI assistance.

Claude Code brings AI-powered coding assistance directly into your development environment. Developers can work with repository files and commands within supported development environments. It targets professional developers working on projects of various sizes.
Claude Code brings assistance into the repository workflow. It can inspect project context and propose edits or commands, while the developer controls permissions and reviews the outcome. Plans provide different usage allowances rather than fixed limits on repository size.
Claude Code offers AI-powered code generation, debugging assistance, and code review capabilities. Available usage depends on the account and plan; repository size alone does not determine access. The tool supports everyday coding tasks and intensive development work through different AI model access levels.
Evaluate the tool on a contained repository task. Inspect edits, run tests, and compare the amount of manual review required. Generated code and executed commands need developer oversight.
Claude Code also supports Anthropic Console access billed by API consumption. Subscription limits depend on the selected model, context, and task. Review file edits and command outcomes before accepting the result.
OpenAI Codex helps developers inspect repositories, edit code and run tools through local clients and eligible cloud tasks.

Codex is OpenAI's coding agent for developers who want help writing, reviewing and maintaining software. It can work with a repository, explain code, make edits and run development tools. Local clients and eligible cloud environments provide different ways to carry out a task.
Codex works on a development task with project context rather than only returning an isolated code snippet. It can inspect files and use tools while making changes. Its suggestions and test output help a developer review a result, but generated code still needs appropriate checks.
Start in a repository and describe the behavior you want changed. Codex can examine existing implementation, edit files and run available checks. Project instructions, environment permissions and installed tools shape what it can do. Review the diff and any remaining failures before accepting changes.
The CLI and IDE extension provide local development workflows. Codex Cloud runs tasks in managed environments for eligible accounts, subject to workspace settings. Cloud work can continue while a computer is asleep, whereas local workflows depend on the device running the task.
OpenAI shows coding workflows and examples for Codex. Evaluate it with a representative task and your repository's checks. A successful demonstration does not establish correctness for a different codebase, dependency set or deployment environment.
Allowances vary by plan, task complexity, tools and model. Check account eligibility and usage before starting long-running tasks.
Augment Code is an AI coding platform for engineering teams running agents across triage, coding, review and verification.

Augment Code is an AI coding platform for professional engineering teams that want agents to work across the software delivery loop, not just autocomplete code. Cosmos coordinates agents for triage, authoring, review and verification, with shared organization knowledge and controls for larger codebases.
Augment Code is positioned less like a single coding assistant and more like an organization-level agent system. The homepage describes specialized experts for each stage: Work Dispatcher, PR Author, Pair Review, Deep Code Review, PR Risk Analysis and Tester.
Its main technical differentiator is the Context Engine. Augment says it maps codebase structure and pulls only the slice relevant to the task, instead of sending broad keyword matches to a model. That matters for teams worried about token cost, context quality and large-repo changes.
Teams can use shipped experts, fork them or build their own templates with separate environments, capabilities and memory. Cosmos adds an expert registry, human-in-the-loop escalation, organization knowledge, scheduling, sandboxes, shared file systems and lifecycle triggers.
The enterprise feature set includes zero data retention, CMEK encryption, VPC deployment, single-tenant instances, BYOK for models, data residency controls, replayable runs, on-prem deployment, HIPAA BAA availability and dedicated account support.
Augment's homepage includes vendor-reported customer outcomes. Those figures are examples of particular deployments, not guaranteed results for every team.
The product suits teams that need shared agent workflows, policy controls and codebase context. Standard and Business support is community-based with tickets through the support portal, while Enterprise adds dedicated support.
Standard and Business usage is pooled across the team. Extra usage is handled with pay-as-you-go top-ups, and the pricing FAQ lists a 40% service fee on LLM usage, with compute billed separately and no service fee on compute.
Amp is a coding agent for developers who want CLI, editor, and web control over model-powered coding work.

Amp is a coding agent and development environment for web, terminal, and native app workflows. It can inspect projects, edit code, and use tools. Its current experience includes orbs: machines created for agent threads with the project's code and tools ready to use.
Amp combines the coding agent with a development environment. An orb supplies a machine for a thread, so a remote task can continue after you close your laptop. Local CLI workflows and your own runners provide other ways to work.
Create a project from a Git repository, then give the agent a task. The web experience starts threads in orbs, while the CLI can work on your machine or from scripts. Native apps add notifications and ways to follow up on agent work.
Threads and workspace features support collaboration. Plugins and skills customize the workflow, and model routing can use supported external accounts. A consumer subscription must be connected and eligible; it does not automatically cover every model or infrastructure charge.
Amp publishes product examples and vendor-selected feedback rather than a universal independent rating. Review generated code and test changes in your project. Orb resource needs, provider access, and the selected workflow affect cost.
Hobby is free, with pay-as-you-go orbs or your own runners. Paid individual tiers start at $20/month. Teams have no additional team charge, and members can use different tiers. Enterprise pricing is custom. Amp lists no token fee for supported external subscriptions or BYOK; provider charges and orb usage still depend on the selected setup.
Looking for alternatives to other popular tools? Check out other posts in the alternatives series and flowtools.co, a directory of best AI tools with filters for tags and categories for easy browsing and discovery.
Kiro is an agentic IDE, CLI, and web app for developers who turn prompts into specs, code, docs, and tests.

Kiro is an agentic coding environment for developers who want AI help with software delivery, not just code snippets. It turns a prompt into requirements, design notes, implementation tasks, code, docs, and tests across an IDE, CLI, and web.
Kiro is built around specs rather than chat alone. A natural language request becomes structured requirements, an architectural design, and sequenced tasks that map back to those requirements. That gives the agent a documented plan before it starts changing files.
The workflow also extends beyond the desktop editor. Kiro CLI brings agents into the terminal, while Kiro Web runs sessions in isolated cloud sandboxes against GitHub or GitLab repositories. Steering files carry project rules across the IDE, CLI, and web.
In the IDE, developers can review live code diffs, approve changes, diagnose syntax and type errors, generate commit messages, and use image inputs for UI or architecture context. Autopilot mode can reduce step-by-step prompting while scripts and commands still stay under user control.
Kiro supports common languages including Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust, SQL, YAML, and HCL. The CLI installs on macOS, Linux, and Windows, and subscriptions also work in ACP compatible IDEs and development automation.
Kiro does not publish a public average rating. Customer quotes praise the spec-driven workflow, background hooks, Terraform and Python support, and stronger implementation plans. Practical limits are visible too: usage is credit-metered, premium model access depends on plan and country or region, and autonomous mode is only in Kiro Web today.
Team plans add centralized billing, usage analytics, SAML/SCIM SSO through AWS IAM Identity Center, organization management, and enterprise security controls.
Use an open-source coding agent for editors and the terminal, with supported model providers and reviewable changes.

Cline is an open-source AI coding agent that runs inside VS Code, your terminal, CI pipelines, or your own product through its SDK. It is built for developers who want an autonomous agent that edits across a whole project, runs commands, and works with supported model providers while you keep control of cost.
Cline is open source (Apache 2.0) and model-agnostic, with several model-access options, including usage billing, BYOK, and optional ClinePass. Its Plan-and-Act split is the core mechanism: Plan mode lists which files it will touch and the steps it will take, then Act mode carries them out one approval at a time, keeping the agent transparent and reviewable rather than a black box.
You point Cline at a task and it reads the codebase, proposes a plan, then makes coordinated changes across many files while keeping imports, types, and behavior consistent. It runs tests, starts dev servers, and reacts to terminal output live. A .clinerules file teaches it your standards, architecture, and deployment conventions.
Beyond the editor, the CLI runs in scripts, cron jobs, and CI pipelines. You can register custom tools and MCP servers and set up multi-agent teams where a coordinator delegates to specialists. Cline reports contributions from more than 250 contributors.
Evaluate the Plan and Act workflow with representative changes, and inspect commands before approving them. Large tasks can consume substantial model usage. Cline reports more than 11 million installs across supported platforms; an install count is not a count of unique developers.
The extension and model access have separate economics. Compare provider usage charges and optional ClinePass with the tasks you expect to run.