The best alternative to GitHub Copilot is Cursor. If that doesn't suit you, we've compiled a ranked list of other GitHub Copilot alternatives to help you find a suitable replacement. Other interesting alternatives to GitHub Copilot are: Windsurf, Claude Code, Codex and Augment Code.
GitHub Copilot alternatives are mainly AI Coding tools. Browse these if you want a narrower list of alternatives or looking for a specific functionality of GitHub Copilot.
Built to make you extraordinarily productive, Cursor is the best way to code with AI

Cursor is an AI-powered code editor that transforms how developers write and edit code through intelligent automation. Built for modern development teams, it combines traditional editing with advanced AI assistance to speed up coding workflows. The platform targets developers who want smarter code completion and AI-driven editing without sacrificing control.
Cursor sets itself apart by offering context-aware AI assistance that goes beyond basic autocomplete. The editor learns from your codebase and coding patterns to provide relevant suggestions. Its AI agents can handle complex editing tasks while maintaining code quality and consistency.
The platform offers intelligent code completion that understands project context and coding style. Users can leverage AI-powered editing for refactoring, bug fixes, and code optimization.
The editor supports collaborative development with real-time sharing and version control integration. Background agents work continuously to analyze code and suggest improvements without interrupting the development flow.
Cursor has an average rating of 4.8 out of 5 stars from over 1,200 reviews on various platforms.
Users praise the AI-powered code completion and editing features. They find the interface clean and responsive. Many appreciate the seamless integration with existing workflows. Some users mention occasional lag with large codebases. They also note that the AI suggestions can sometimes be overly aggressive for simple tasks.
Cursor offers several pricing plans:
Teams pricing starts at $40 per user monthly with Privacy Mode enforcement, admin dashboard, and centralized billing. Enterprise offers custom pricing with enhanced usage, SCIM management, and priority support.
The free Hobby plan includes a two-week Pro trial, making it easy to test premium features before committing to paid plans.
Looking for alternatives to other popular tools? Check out other posts in the alternatives series and flowtools.co, a directory of best AI tools with filters for tags and categories for easy browsing and discovery.
The first agentic IDE, and then some. The Windsurf Editor is where the work of developers and AI truly flow together, allowing for a coding experience that feels like literal magic.

Windsurf is an AI coding assistant that helps developers write code faster and more efficiently. This free tool integrates with popular IDEs like VS Code and JetBrains to boost coding productivity. It targets developers who want smart auto-completion and coding support without the cost.
Windsurf stands out by offering a completely free tier while competing tools charge monthly fees. Users consistently compare it favorably to GitHub Copilot, noting similar functionality at no cost. The tool focuses on practical coding assistance rather than complex features, making it accessible for developers at all levels.
The platform provides intelligent code completion, automatic boilerplate generation, and test writing assistance. It supports multiple programming languages and integrates seamlessly with existing development workflows.
The SWE-1 model powers the AI suggestions, helping with everything from simple functions to complex code structures. Developers can use it for rapid prototyping, debugging assistance, and learning new coding patterns.
Windsurf has an average rating of 4.5 out of 5 stars from 79 reviews on Product Hunt.
Users praise the AI coding assistant for boosting productivity by up to 30%. Many compare it favorably to GitHub Copilot, noting it's free and works well with various IDEs including VS Code and JetBrains.
Users appreciate the auto-completion features and find it easy to use for writing boilerplate code and tests. The team provides helpful support through Discord. Some users want more features like code refactoring and explanations.
Windsurf offers several pricing plans:
Add-on credits are available: $10 for 250 credits on Pro, $40 for 1,000 credits on Teams and Enterprise.
The Free plan includes a 2-week Pro trial to test premium features before committing to a paid plan.
Unleash Claude’s raw power directly in your terminal. Search million-line codebases instantly. Turn hours-long workflows into a single command. Your tools. Your workflow. Your codebase, evolving at thought speed.

Claude Code brings AI-powered coding assistance directly into your development environment. This tool helps developers write and debug code faster without switching between separate AI chat applications. It targets professional developers working on projects of various sizes.
Claude Code eliminates context switching by embedding AI assistance directly in your coding environment. Unlike standalone AI chat tools, it provides coding help without breaking your development flow. The tiered pricing structure matches different usage patterns and codebase complexity levels.
Claude Code offers AI-powered code generation, debugging assistance, and code review capabilities. It works with smaller codebases through the Pro plan and scales up to larger, more complex projects with the Max plans. The tool supports everyday coding tasks and intensive development work through different AI model access levels.
Claude Code offers several pricing plans:
Annual Pro subscriptions get a discount at $17/month ($200 billed upfront).
Claude Code provides AI-powered coding assistance directly in your development environment, making it faster to write and debug code compared to switching between separate AI chat tools.
Delegate tasks to a software engineering agent in the cloud.

Codex transforms natural language descriptions into working code across multiple programming languages. This AI-powered coding assistant helps developers write, debug, and understand code faster than traditional methods. Built by OpenAI, it serves programmers of all skill levels who want to boost their coding productivity.
Codex stands out by understanding context better than other code generators. It can maintain conversation flow across multiple coding requests and adapt its suggestions based on your specific project needs. The model was trained on billions of lines of public code, giving it deep knowledge of programming patterns and best practices.
Codex excels at code generation, completion, and explanation tasks. You can describe what you want in plain English, and it produces functional code snippets or entire programs.
The tool handles debugging by analyzing error messages and suggesting fixes. It also translates code between different programming languages and adds comments to explain complex logic.
Common use cases include building web applications, automating data tasks, creating APIs, and learning new programming concepts.
Codex is integrated into OpenAI's ChatGPT subscription tiers rather than sold separately.
The main value of Codex is its ability to generate functional code from natural language descriptions across multiple programming languages.
Augment Code is an AI coding platform for engineering teams running agents across triage, coding, review and verification.

Augment Code is an AI coding platform for professional engineering teams that want agents to work across the software delivery loop, not just autocomplete code. Cosmos coordinates agents for triage, authoring, review and verification, with shared organization knowledge and controls for larger codebases.
Augment Code is positioned less like a single coding assistant and more like an organization-level agent system. The homepage describes specialized experts for each stage: Work Dispatcher, PR Author, Pair Review, Deep Code Review, PR Risk Analysis and Tester.
Its main technical differentiator is the Context Engine. Augment says it maps codebase structure and pulls only the slice relevant to the task, instead of sending broad keyword matches to a model. That matters for teams worried about token cost, context quality and large-repo changes.
Teams can use shipped experts, fork them or build their own templates with separate environments, capabilities and memory. Cosmos adds an expert registry, human-in-the-loop escalation, organization knowledge, scheduling, sandboxes, shared file systems and lifecycle triggers.
The enterprise feature set includes zero data retention, CMEK encryption, VPC deployment, single-tenant instances, BYOK for models, data residency controls, replayable runs, on-prem deployment, HIPAA BAA availability and dedicated account support.
Augment Code does not publish independent star ratings or named third-party testimonials. Augment's homepage cites customer outcome metrics, including 70%+ of pages resolved before the on-call engineer joins and 60%+ of CVEs automatically remediated, but those are vendor-reported figures.
The clearest buyer tradeoff is fit. The product is aimed at teams that need shared agent workflows, policy controls and codebase context, not individuals looking for a low-cost personal assistant. Business support is community-based with tickets through the support portal, while Enterprise adds dedicated support.
Business usage is pooled across the team. Extra usage is handled with pay-as-you-go top-ups, and the pricing FAQ lists a 40% service fee on LLM usage plus Cosmos compute time.
Amp is a coding agent for developers who want CLI, editor, and web control over model-powered coding work.

Amp is an AI coding agent for developers who want agent work in the terminal, editor, and web UI. Start in the CLI, connect an IDE, share a thread, and let Amp inspect code, edit files, and run commands. The site positions it as a coding agent for leading models rather than a fixed model wrapper.
Amp is opinionated about model use and workflow shape. Its docs describe a product that moves with new models and uses modes instead of asking users to wire every model choice themselves.
The other difference is the thread model. A coding session can be shared, searched, referenced from another thread, controlled from the web, or continued from mobile while the CLI keeps running.
After signing in, install the CLI and run amp for an interactive coding session. You can also use amp -x for non-interactive prompts, pipe input into the CLI, mention files, paste images, and connect an IDE so Amp can see the active file and selection.
For larger teams and custom workflows, Amp can load AGENTS.md instructions, use MCP servers, and run TypeScript plugins that add commands, tools, prompts, permissions, modes, and event handlers. Threads can be private, unlisted, workspace-shared, or group-shared.
Amp does not publish a third-party rating. The homepage includes vendor-selected quotes praising its agent behavior, polished experience, repeat use, and diagram generation.
The docs also show caveats. Subagents work in isolation, users cannot steer them mid-task, and the main agent receives the final summary rather than step-by-step details.
Unused credits expire after one year of account inactivity, and workspace credits are pooled across members.
Looking for alternatives to other popular tools? Check out other posts in the alternatives series and flowtools.co, a directory of best AI tools with filters for tags and categories for easy browsing and discovery.
Kiro is an agentic IDE, CLI, and web app for developers who turn prompts into specs, code, docs, and tests.

Kiro is an agentic coding environment for developers who want AI help with software delivery, not just code snippets. It turns a prompt into requirements, design notes, implementation tasks, code, docs, and tests across an IDE, CLI, and web.
Kiro is built around specs rather than chat alone. A natural language request becomes structured requirements, an architectural design, and sequenced tasks that map back to those requirements. That gives the agent a documented plan before it starts changing files.
The workflow also extends beyond the desktop editor. Kiro CLI brings agents into the terminal, while Kiro Web runs sessions in isolated cloud sandboxes against GitHub or GitLab repositories. Steering files carry project rules across the IDE, CLI, and web.
In the IDE, developers can review live code diffs, approve changes, diagnose syntax and type errors, generate commit messages, and use image inputs for UI or architecture context. Autopilot mode can reduce step-by-step prompting while scripts and commands still stay under user control.
Kiro supports common languages including Python, JavaScript, TypeScript, Go, Rust, SQL, YAML, and HCL. The CLI installs on macOS, Linux, and Windows, and subscriptions also work in ACP compatible IDEs and development automation.
Kiro does not publish a public average rating. Customer quotes praise the spec-driven workflow, background hooks, Terraform and Python support, and stronger implementation plans. Practical limits are visible too: usage is credit-metered, premium model access depends on plan and country or region, and autonomous mode is only in Kiro Web today.
Team plans add centralized billing, usage analytics, SAML/SCIM SSO through AWS IAM Identity Center, organization management, and enterprise security controls.
Cline is an open-source AI coding agent for VS Code and the terminal, built for developers who want any model and no lock-in.

Cline is an open-source AI coding agent that runs inside VS Code, your terminal, CI pipelines, or your own product through its SDK. It is built for developers who want an autonomous agent that edits across a whole project, runs commands, and works with any model while you keep control of cost.
Cline is genuinely open source (Apache 2.0) and model-agnostic, so it never sells you inference at a markup. Its Plan-and-Act split is the core mechanism: Plan mode lists which files it will touch and the steps it will take, then Act mode carries them out one approval at a time, keeping the agent transparent and reviewable rather than a black box.
You point Cline at a task and it reads the codebase, proposes a plan, then makes coordinated changes across many files while keeping imports, types, and behavior consistent. It runs tests, starts dev servers, and reacts to terminal output live. A .clinerules file teaches it your standards, architecture, and deployment conventions.
Beyond the editor, the CLI runs in scripts, cron jobs, and CI pipelines. You can register custom tools and MCP servers and set up multi-agent teams where a coordinator delegates to specialists. Cline is built by 250+ contributors and backed by a $32M seed and Series A round.
Cline is widely rated as one of the strongest open-source coding agents and is installed by more than 8 million developers. Reviewers praise the transparent Plan/Act workflow, the lack of vendor lock-in, and support for many providers, including local models. The common criticism is that it suits power users more than beginners, and that bring-your-own-key inference costs can add up on large tasks.
Because the tool is free and you pay model providers directly, Cline is one of the cheapest ways to run an autonomous coding agent, especially for developers who already hold API keys.